4.7 Article

Gray Radiation Hydrodynamics with the FLASH Code for Astrophysical Applications

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 876, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab18f9

关键词

methods: numerical; radiation: dynamics; radiative transfer

资金

  1. University of Chicago, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [B523820]
  2. U.S. DOE NNSA-ASC through the Argonne Institute for Computing in Science [57789]
  3. National Science Foundation [AST-0909132]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present the newly incorporated gray radiation hydrodynamics capabilities of the FLASH code based on a radiation flux-limiter-aware hydrodynamics numerical implementation designed specifically for applications in astrophysical problems. The implemented numerical methods consist of changes in the unsplit hydrodynamics solver and adjustments in the flux-limited radiation diffusion unit. Our approach can handle problems in both the strong and weak radiation-matter coupling limits, as well as transitions between the two regimes. Appropriate extensions in the Helmholtz equation of state are implemented to treat two-temperature astrophysical plasmas involving the interaction between radiation and matter and the addition of a new opacity unit based on the OPAL opacity database, commonly used for astrophysical fluids. A set of radiation-hydrodynamics test problems is presented aiming to showcase the new capabilities of FLASH and to provide direct comparison to other similar software instruments available in the literature. To illustrate the capacity of FLASH to simulate phenomena occurring in stellar explosions, such as shock breakout, radiative precursors, and supernova ejecta heating due to the decays of radioactive Ni-56 and Co-56, we also present 1D supernova simulations and compare the computed light curves to those of the SNEC code. The latest public release of FLASH with these enhanced capabilities is available for download and use by the broader astrophysics community.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据