4.6 Article

Hydrologic conditions drive denitrification and greenhouse gas emissions in stormwater detention basins

期刊

ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
卷 85, 期 -, 页码 67-75

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.10.018

关键词

Greenhouse gases; Denitrification; Methane; Nitrous oxide; Stormwater; Urban systems

资金

  1. New York State Water Resources Institute
  2. Cornell Engineering Learning Initiatives
  3. National Science Foundation [1144153]
  4. Cornell Cross-Scale Biogeochemistry Climate IGERT under NSF [1069193]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stormwater detention basins are primarily designed to detain large volumes of storm runoff and trap suspended sediments and associated pollutants. Detaining and retaining nutrients are often not a design focus. The combination of variable moisture patterns in stormwater basins along with potential nutrient influxes may make these basins hotspots for nitrogen transformations such as denitrification, as well as potential sources of greenhouse gases nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4). Nitrous oxide and CH4 emissions were measured using static chambers in four stormwater detention basins - two fast-draining or 'dry' basins and two slow-draining or 'wet' basins. Denitrification potential of soils collected from these basins was also measured using the denitrification enzyme assay (DEA). While N2O emissions were low, CH4 emissions were higher in both wet basins, averaging 5667 tig Cm-2 h(-1) in the wettest basin. Denitrification potential was higher in the wet basins (2.27 mg N kg(-1) h(-1)) compared to the dry basins (0.23 mg N kg(-1) h(-1)). Overall, wet detention basins had higher greenhouse gas emissions but also had higher potential for nitrate removal via denitrification. Designing future stormwater control measures to maintain a subsurface saturated zone rather than fully saturated soils should be considered to promote denitrification while also reducing CH4 emissions at the surface. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据