4.1 Article

Co-design, evaluation and the Northern Ireland Innovation Lab

期刊

PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT
卷 39, 期 4, 页码 290-299

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2019.1592920

关键词

Co-design; co-production; evaluation; Northern Ireland; policy labs; public services

资金

  1. AHRC [AH/P009263/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Around the world there are more than 100 policy labs-multi-disciplinary government teams developing public services and policies using innovation methods to engage citizens and stakeholders. These policy labs use a range of innovation methods and approaches, including co-production, co-creation, co-design, behavioural insights, systems thinking, ethnography, data science, nudge theory and lean processes. Although the methods may vary, one element is consistent: policy labs actively, creatively and collaboratively engage the public and a wide range of stakeholders in jointly developing solutions. The Northern Ireland Public Sector Innovation Lab (iLab) is part of a growing UK and international community of policy labs using co-design to engage with users for value co-creation, aiming to improve public governance by creating a safe space to generate ideas, test prototypes and refine concepts with beneficiaries. Drawing on iLab's experience, this paper explores three questions: What are the main determinants of effective co-design? What are the unintended consequences of co-design? And what lessons can be learned from iLab and shared with other policy labs? IMPACT There is a need to reinstate the legitimacy of public policy-making and public service development through more effective citizen engagement. To experiment with more creative and user-centred approaches, governments are establishing Policy Labs to engage citizens at multiple stages of the development process. The Northern Ireland Public Sector Innovation Lab (iLab) is part of a growing UK and international community of Policy Labs using co-design to engage with users for value co-creation, aiming to improve public governance by creating a safe space to generate ideas, test prototypes and refine concepts with beneficiaries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据