4.6 Article

The PI3K and MAPK/p38 pathways control stress granule assembly in a hierarchical manner

期刊

LIFE SCIENCE ALLIANCE
卷 2, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

LIFE SCIENCE ALLIANCE LLC
DOI: 10.26508/lsa.201800257

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Rosalind-Franklin-Fellowship of the University of Groningen
  2. BMBF e:Med initiative GlioPATH [01ZX1402]
  3. BMBF e: Med initiative MAPTor-NET [031A426A/B]
  4. Stichting TSC Fonds
  5. German Research Foundation [TH 1358/3-1]
  6. MESI-STRAT project - European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [754688]
  7. German Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung [01ZZ1803G]
  8. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [CRC 1076]
  9. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [754688] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

All cells and organisms exhibit stress-coping mechanisms to ensure survival. Cytoplasmic protein-RNA assemblies termed stress granules are increasingly recognized to promote cellular survival under stress. Thus, they might represent tumor vulnerabilities that are currently poorly explored. The translationinhibitory eIF2 alpha kinases are established as main drivers of stress granule assembly. Using a systems approach, we identify the translation enhancers PI3K and MAPK/p38 as pro-stress-granule-kinases. They act through the metabolic master regulator mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) to promote stress granule assembly. When highly active, PI3K is the main driver of stress granules; however, the impact of p38 becomes apparent as PI3K activity declines. PI3K and p38 thus act in a hierarchical manner to drive mTORC1 activity and stress granule assembly. Of note, this signaling hierarchy is also present in human breast cancer tissue. Importantly, only the recognition of the PI3K-p38 hierarchy under stress enabled the discovery of p38's role in stress granule formation. In summary, we assign a new prosurvival function to the key oncogenic kinases PI3K and p38, as they hierarchically promote stress granule formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据