4.6 Article

Waste dumps as local biodiversity hotspots for soil macrofauna and ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in the agricultural landscape

期刊

ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
卷 81, 期 -, 页码 1-13

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.04.023

关键词

Epigeal macrofauna; Carabidae; Diversity; Conservation; Waste dumps; Agricultural landscape

资金

  1. University of Presov in Presov Grant agency

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Man-made sites are found to often provide biodiversity refuges in anthropogenically impacted landscape and offering valuable analogues of natural habitats. We surveyed surface dwelling soil macrofauna and ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) assemblages by pitfall trapping across the eight stands of waste dumps and eight comparative biotopes in Eastern Slovakia. To our knowledge, this is the first such survey. During 18 weeks period in 2011 and 2012, a total of 38.814 individuals were trapped belonging to 17 soil macrofauna orders, 38 Coleopteran families and 98 Carabidae species. We analysed differences in assemblages of waste dumps and comparative biotopes and tested responses of orders, beetles and carabids to selected environmental variables. Assemblages collected from waste dumps had consistently higher diversity than their surrounding habitats, waste dumps equally showed higher proportion of slow-moving sapro-phytophagous orders and large wingless ground beetles colonizing native habitats. Ten rare ground beetles species were only captured from waste dumps. No clearly, unambiguous pattern was observed concerning distinctions in assemblages in relation to selected environmental variables, however, trees and shrub vegetation as well as soil moisture apparently affected community distinctions between studied habitats. We concluded, that reclaimed waste dumps as well as illegal waste dumps under different stages of succession could support surface dwelling soil macrofauna functional and the ground beetle species diversity in the agricultural landscape. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据