4.8 Article

Combined Fenton and starvation therapies using hemoglobin and glucose oxidase

期刊

NANOSCALE
卷 11, 期 12, 页码 5705-5716

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8nr09107b

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Melbourne for Melbourne International Research Scholarship (MIRS)
  2. Melbourne International Fee Remission Scholarship (MIFRS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Separately, Fenton and starvation cancer therapies have been recently reported as impressive methods for tumor destruction. Here, we introduce natural hemoglobin and glucose oxidase (GOx) for efficient cancer treatment following combined Fenton and starvation therapies. GOx and hemoglobin were encapsulated in zeolitic imidazolate frameworks 8 (ZIF-8) to fabricate a pH-sensitive MOF activated by tumor acidity. In the slightly acidic environment of cancer cells, GOx is released and it consumes d-glucose and molecular oxygen, nutrients essential for the survival of cancer cells, and produces gluconic acid and hydrogen peroxide, respectively. The produced gluconic acid increases the acidity of the tumor microenvironment leading to complete MOF destruction and enhances hemoglobin and GOx release. The Fe ions from the heme groups of hemoglobin also release in the presence of both endogenous and produced H2O2 and generate hydroxyl radicals. The produced OH radical can rapidly oxidize the surrounding biomacromolecules in the biological system and treat the cancer cells. In vitro experiments demonstrate that this novel nanoparticle is cytotoxic to cancer cells HeLa and MCF-7, at very low concentrations (<2 g mL(-1)). In addition, the selectivity index values are 5.52 and 11.04 for HeLa and MCF-7 cells, respectively, which are much higher than those of commercial drugs and those of similar studies reported by other research groups. This work thus demonstrates a novel pH-sensitive system containing hemoglobin and GOx for effective and selective cancer treatment using both radical generation and nutrient starvation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据