4.7 Article

Improved crystal quality of non-polar a-plane GaN epi-layers directly grown on optimized hole-array patterned r-sapphire substrates

期刊

CRYSTENGCOMM
卷 21, 期 17, 页码 2747-2753

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8ce01988f

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11574362, 61804176]
  2. Innovative Clean-Energy Research and Application Program of Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission [Z151100003515001]
  3. National Key Technology R&D Program of China [2016YFB0400603]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The characteristics of a-plane GaN films directly grown on silicon dioxide (SiO2) hole-array patterned r-sapphire substrates (HPSS) were investigated in this work. Various pattern sizes of SiO2 HPSS were prepared to obtain fully coalescent a-plane GaN films with high crystalline quality. The anisotropic behavior and crystalline quality characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) were significantly improved in a-plane GaN grown on optimized micro-HPSS (MHPSS) of 3 mu m pattern with 1 mu m diameter, in which the X-ray rocking curve-full width at half maximum (XRC-FWHM) values were 513 arcsec along the m-axis and 531 arcsec along the c axis. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) results suggested that the presence of the SiO2 mask might influence the dominant fast-growing facets. The different sizes of patterns governed the lateral growth length of a-plane GaN islands, which increased the mosaic size along the m direction and eliminated the anisotropic behavior. In addition, the modified Williamson-Hall (W-H) analysis showed that the density of basal stacking faults (BSFs) was reduced by an order of magnitude in a-plane GaN using MHPSS, as compared with a-plane GaN grown on planar r-sapphire. This work provides a simple and effective method without interruption and regrowth to solve two important problems in a-plane GaN, in which not only was the anisotropic behavior almost eliminated, but also the BSF density was greatly reduced.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据