4.3 Article

Increase of IRF-1 gene expression and impairment of T regulatory cells suppression activity on patients with myelodysplastic syndrome: A longitudinal one-year study

期刊

LEUKEMIA RESEARCH
卷 55, 期 -, 页码 6-17

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2017.01.008

关键词

IRF-1; Treg; Myelodysplastic syndrome; T regulatory cells; Foxp3; Immune system

资金

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [2011/50910-8]
  2. Research and Development from Fleury Group [001/2012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studies have demonstrated that abnormalities in interferon regulatory factor-1 (IRF-1) expression might develop myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). IRF-1 was described as modulator of T regulatory (Treg) cells by suppressing Foxp3 on mice. We aimed to determine the role of Treg and IRF-1 in MDS. Thirty-eight MDS patients fulfilling WHO criteria and classified according to risk scores were evaluated at time 0 (TO) and after 12 months (T12) for: Treg suppression activity in coculture with T effector (Teff) cells; IRF-1 and Foxp3 genetic expression by qRT-PCR; IL-2, 4, 6, 10, 17, TNF alpha. and IFN gamma production by Cytometric Bead Array. No differences in Foxp3 expression (T0 = 0.06 +/- 0.06 vs T12 = 0.06 +/- 0.12, p = 0.5), Treg number (TO = 5.62 +/- 2.84 x 10(5) vs T12 =4.87 +/- 2.62 x 10(5); p = 0.3) and Teff percentage (T0=16.8 +/- 9.56% vs T12 =13.1 +/- 6.3%; p = 0.06) were observed on T12. Low risk MDS patients showed a higher number of Treg (5.2 +/- 2.6 x 10(5)) versus high risk group (2.6 +/- 1.2 x 10(5), p = 0.03). Treg suppression activity was impaired on TO and T12.Cytokine production and IRF-1 expression were increased on T12. The correlation between IRF-1 and FoxP3 was negative (r(2) = 0.317, p = 0.045) on T0. These results suggest a hyper activity of the immune system, probably secondary to Treg suppression activity impairment. This state may induce the loss of tolerance culminating in the proliferation of MDS clones. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据