4.3 Article

Outcomes following front-line chemotherapy in peripheral T-cell lymphoma: 10-year experience at The Royal Marsden and The Christie Hospital

期刊

LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA
卷 59, 期 7, 页码 1586-1595

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2017.1393671

关键词

Peripheral T-cell lymphoma; chemotherapy; hematopoietic progenitor cell transplant

资金

  1. Amgen
  2. AstraZeneca
  3. Bayer
  4. Celgene
  5. Merrimack
  6. Medimmune
  7. Merck Serono
  8. Sanofi
  9. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  10. Merck KgA
  11. Janssen-Cilag
  12. Sanofi Oncology
  13. Merck-Serono
  14. Novartis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We evaluated the outcomes for patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) undergoing front-line chemotherapy at our institutions between 2002 and 2012. One hundred and fifty-six patients were eligible, comprising PTCL not otherwise specified (NOS) (n=50, 32.0%), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) (n=44, 28.2%), anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL) ALK negative (n=23, 14.7%), ALCL ALK positive (n=16, 10.3%), and other (n=23, 14.7%). Most patients received CHOP (66.0%) and 13.0% received an autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell transplant (HPCT). With a median follow-up of 63.4 months, 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was 38.8% and 19.8% respectively. Independent risk factors for inferior OS were age >60 years, International Prognostic Index (IPI)2 and lack of complete response to induction. When responding patients were compared by receipt of an autologous HPCT versus not, HPCT was associated with improved PFS (p=.001) and OS (p=.046) and remained significant for PFS in multivariate analysis suggesting a possible therapeutic benefit.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据