4.7 Article

Protein arginine methyltransferase 5 has prognostic relevance and is a druggable target in multiple myeloma

期刊

LEUKEMIA
卷 32, 期 4, 页码 996-1002

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2017.334

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [P50 - 100707, RO-1 CA050947, RO-1 CA 178264]
  2. VA merit grant [I01BX001584]
  3. Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC) [9980]
  4. 'Innovative Immunotherapeutic Treatments of Human Cancer' Multi Unit [16695]
  5. AIRC
  6. CARICAL foundation
  7. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P01CA155258, R01CA050947, R01CA178264, P50CA100707, R01CA207237] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  8. Veterans Affairs [I01BX001584] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Arginine methyltransferases critically regulate cellular homeostasis by modulating the functional outcome of their substrates. The protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) is an enzyme involved in growth and survival pathways promoting tumorigenesis. However, little is known about the biologic function of PRMT5 and its therapeutic potential in multiple myeloma (MM). In the present study, we identified and validated PRMT5 as a new therapeutic target in MM. PRMT5 is overexpressed in patient MM cells and associated with decreased progression-free survival and overall survival. Either genetic knockdown or pharmacological inhibition of PRMT5 with the inhibitor EPZ015666 significantly inhibited growth of both cell lines and patient MM cells. Furthermore, PRMT5 inhibition abrogated NF-kappa B signaling. Interestingly, mass spectrometry identified a tripartite motif-containing protein 21 TRIM21 as a new PRMT5-partner, and we delineated a TRIM21-dependent mechanism of NF-kappa B inhibition. Importantly, oral administration of EPZ015666 significantly decreased MM growth in a humanized murine model of MM. These data both demonstrate the oncogenic role and prognostic relevance of PRMT5 in MM pathogenesis, and provide the rationale for novel therapies targeting PRMT5 to improve patient outcome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据