4.7 Article

A clinical-molecular prognostic model to predict survival in patients with post polycythemia vera and post essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis

期刊

LEUKEMIA
卷 31, 期 12, 页码 2726-2731

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2017.169

关键词

-

资金

  1. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC
  2. Milano, Italy)
  3. Special Program Molecular Clinical Oncology 5 x 1000 [1005]
  4. AIRC [IG2014-15967]
  5. Ministero della Salute [GR-2011-02352109]
  6. Fondazione Matarelli (Milano, Italy)
  7. Fondazione Rusconi (Varese, Italy)
  8. AIL Varese ONLUS
  9. Fondazione Regionale Ricerca Biomedica (FRRB), Regione Lombardia
  10. Cancer Research and Treatment Fund, Inc., New York, NY

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) are myeloproliferative neoplasms with variable risk of evolution into post-PV and post-ET myelofibrosis, from now on referred to as secondary myelofibrosis (SMF). No specific tools have been defined for risk stratification in SMF. To develop a prognostic model for predicting survival, we studied 685 JAK2, CALR, and MPL annotated patients with SMF. Median survival of the whole cohort was 9.3 years (95% CI: 8-not reached-NR-). Through penalized Cox regressions we identified negative predictors of survival and according to beta risk coefficients we assigned 2 points to hemoglobin level <11 g/dl, to circulating blasts >= 3%, and to CALR-unmutated genotype, 1 point to platelet count <150 x 10(9)/l and to constitutional symptoms, and 0.15 points to any year of age. Myelofibrosis Secondary to PV and ET-Prognostic Model (MYSEC-PM) allocated SMF patients into four risk categories with different survival (P<0.0001): low (median survival NR; 133 patients), intermediate-1 (9.3 years, 95% CI: 8.1-NR; 245 patients), intermediate-2 (4.4 years, 95% CI: 3.2-7.9; 126 patients), and high risk (2 years, 95% CI: 1.7-3.9; 75 patients). Finally, we found that the MYSEC-PM represents the most appropriate tool for SMF decision-making to be used in clinical and trial settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据