4.7 Article

Cultural bequest values for ecosystem service flows among indigenous fishers: A discrete choice experiment validated with mixed methods

期刊

ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
卷 114, 期 -, 页码 104-116

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.02.028

关键词

Cultural ecosystem services; Bequest value; Discrete choice experiment; Discount rate; Economic valuation; Madagascar

资金

  1. John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation [07-89632-00-GSS]
  2. Waterloo Foundation [449-547]
  3. Network for Social Change
  4. United States National Science Foundation [OISE-0853086]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Perhaps the most understudied ecosystem services are related to socio-cultural values tied to non-material benefits arising from human-ecosystem relationships. Bequest values linked to natural ecosystems can be particularly significant for indigenous communities whose livelihoods and cultures are tied to ecosystems. Here we apply a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to determine indigenous fishers' preferences and willingness-to-pay for bequest gains from management actions in a locally managed marine area in Madagascar, and use our results to estimate an implicit discount rate. We validate our results using a unique rating and ranking game and other mixed methods. We find that bequest is highly valued and important; respondents were willing to pay a substantial portion of their income to protect ecosystems for future generations. Through all of our inquiries, bequest emerged as the highest priority, even when respondents were forced to make trade-offs among other livelihood-supporting ecosystem services. This study is among a relative few to quantify bequest values and apply a DCE to model trade-offs, value ecosystem service flows, and estimate discount rates in a developing country. Our results directly inform coastal management in Madagascar and elsewhere by providing information on the socio-cultural value of bequest in comparison to other ecosystem service benefits. (c) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据