4.4 Article

The effect of low-level laser therapy on tooth movement during canine distalization

期刊

LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE
卷 32, 期 4, 页码 757-764

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s10103-017-2159-0

关键词

Velocity of orthodontic tooth movement; Canine distalization; Low-level laser therapy; IL-1 beta; TGF-beta

资金

  1. Research Fund of Istanbul University (Istanbul, Turkey) [40101]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of the study is to determine the effects of low level laser therapy on tooth movement during canine distalization by evaluating IL-1 beta, TGF-beta 1 levels in gingival crevicular fluid. Maxillary first premolars of the 15 Angle Class II division I patients (12-19 years old) were extracted. Right maxillary canines were distalized by standard protocol as control group whereas the left maxillary canines distalized by laser application. A gallium-aluminum-arsenide diode laser with an output power of 20 mW was applied as five doses from the buccal and the palatal side on the day 0, and the 3rd, 7th, 14th, 21th 30th, 33st, 37th, 60th, 63th, and 67th days. Gingival crevicular fluid samples were obtained with filtration paper at the initial, 7th, 14th, and 21th days, and the IL-1 beta and TGF-beta 1 cytokine levels were analyzed. Orthodontic models and periodontal indices were taken initially and on the days 30th, 60th, and 90th of canine distalization period. Tooth movement was assessed by scanning models (3Shape). The amount of tooth movement in the laser group was 40% more than the control group. First day IL-1 beta levels were statistically higher than initial and 21st day levels (P= 0.003, P = 0.012). The rise in IL-1 beta levels caused the negative correlations between 7th day IL-1 beta and 21st day TGF-beta 1 levels describes the tissue effects of laser application. Periodontal indices showed no sign of gingival inflammation during canine distalization period. As conclusion, laser does accelerate tooth movement and could shorten the whole treatment duration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据