4.8 Article

Resonant Lattice Kerker Effect in Metasurfaces With Electric and Magnetic Optical Responses

期刊

LASER & PHOTONICS REVIEWS
卷 11, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/lpor.201700132

关键词

lattice resonances; kerker condition; metasurfaces; nanoparticle array; all-dielectric; nanostructures; silicon photonics; directional scattering

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Germany) [EV 220/2-1]
  2. Russian Science Foundation (Russian Federation) [16-12-10287]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To achieve efficient light control at subwavelength dimensions, plasmonic and all-dielectric nanoparticles have been utilized both as a single element as well as in the arrays. Here we study 2D periodic nanoparticle arrays (metasurfaces) that support lattice resonances near the Rayleigh anomaly due to the electric dipole (ED) and magnetic dipole (MD) resonant coupling between the nanoparticles. Silicon and core-shell particles are considered. Our investigations are carried out using two independent numerical techniques, namely, the finite-element method and the method of coupled-dipole equations based on the Green function approach. We numerically demonstrate that choosing of lattice periods independently in each mutual-perpendicular direction, it is possible to achieve a full overlap between the ED-lattice resonance and MD resonances of nanoparticles in certain spectral range and to realize the resonant lattice Kerker effect (resonant suppression of the backward scattering or reflection). At the effect conditions, the strong suppression of light reflectance in the structure is appeared due to destructive interference between electromagnetic waves scattered by ED and MD moments of every nanoparticle in the backward direction with respect to the incident light wave. Influence of the array size on the revealed reflectance and transmittance behavior is discussed. The resonant lattice Kerker effect based on the overlap of both ED and MD lattice resonances is also demonstrated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据