4.5 Article

A case-control evaluation of fungiform papillae density in burning mouth syndrome

期刊

LARYNGOSCOPE
卷 128, 期 4, 页码 841-846

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/lary.26828

关键词

Head and neck; oral cavity; facial nerve; pain; gustation

资金

  1. National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research [3R21DE018768-02S1, T32 DE07132]
  2. NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [TL1 RR025016, UL1TR000423]
  3. Washington Dental Service Professorship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

HypothesisIt has been hypothesized that high fungiform papillae density may be a risk factor for developing the taste and pain alterations characteristic of burning mouth syndrome. ObjectiveEvaluate whether fungiform papillae density, taste sensitivity, and mechanical pain sensitivity differ between burning mouth syndrome cases and controls. Study DesignThis case-control study compared cases diagnosed with primary burning mouth syndrome with pain-free controls. MethodsParticipants (17 female cases and 23 female controls) rated the intensity of sucrose, sodium chloride, citric acid, and quinine applied separately to each side of the anterior tongue and sampled whole mouth. Mechanical pain sensitivity was assessed separately for each side of the tongue using weighted pins. Digital photographs of participants' tongues were used to count fungiform papillae. ResultsBurning mouth syndrome cases had increased whole mouth taste intensity. Cases also had increased sensitivity to quinine on the anterior tongue, as well as increased mechanical pain sensitivity on the anterior tongue. Fungiform papillae density did not differ significantly between cases and controls. Fungiform papillae density on the left and right sides of the tongue were correlated in controls; however, there was no left/right side correlation in cases. ConclusionCases had increased pain and taste perception on the anterior tongue. The lack of correlation between left and right fungiform papillae density in cases may be an indication of asymmetrical lingual innervation in these patients. Level of Evidence3b. Laryngoscope, 128:841-846, 2018

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据