4.5 Article

Novel kidney dissociation protocol and image-based flow cytometry facilitate improved analysis of injured proximal tubules

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-RENAL PHYSIOLOGY
卷 316, 期 5, 页码 F847-F855

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajprenal.00354.2018

关键词

epithelial injury; image-based flow cytometry

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01-DK-108968-01]
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration Grant [1I01BX003425-01A1]
  3. Vanderbilt O'Brien Kidney Center NIH [1-P30-DK-114809-01, R01-DK-103831, P50-CA-095103]
  4. NIH Training Grant [T32-DK-007569]
  5. American Heart Association Postdoctoral Fellowship award
  6. Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center NIH Grant [P30-CA-68485]
  7. Vanderbilt Digestive Disease Research Center NIH Grant [DK-058404]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Flow cytometry studies on injured kidney tubules are complicated by the low yield of nucleated single cells. Furthermore, cell-specific responses such as cell cycle dynamics in vivo have conventionally relied on indirect immunohistochemistry and proximal tubule markers that may be downregulated in injury. Here, we report a new tissue dissociation protocol for the kidney with an early fixation step that greatly enhances the yield of single cells. Genetic labeling of the proximal tubule with either mT/mG tomato or R26Fucci2aR (Fucci) cell cycle reporter mice allows us to follow proximal tubule-specific changes in cell cycle after renal injury. Image-based flow cytometry (FlowSight) enables gating of the cell cycle and concurrent visualization of the cells with bright field and fluorescence. We used the Fucci mouse in conjunction with FlowSight to identify a discrete polyploid population in proximal tubules after aristolochic acid injury. The tissue dissociation protocol in conjunction with genetic labeling and image-based flow cytometry is a tool that can improve our understanding of any discrete cell population after injury.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据