4.6 Article

Synthesis of a Multifunctional Graphene Oxide-Based Magnetic Nanocomposite for Efficient Removal of Cr(VI)

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 33, 期 28, 页码 7007-7014

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b01293

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21407151]
  2. Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [2015385]
  3. Key Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [KSZD-EW-Z-022-05]
  4. Science and Technology Service Programs of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [KFJ-STS-ZDTP-002, KFJ-SWSTS-143]
  5. President Foundation of Hefei Institutes of Physical Science of Chinese Academy of Sciences [YZJJ201502]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel magnetic nanocomposite was synthesized using graphene oxide (GO), polyethylenimine (PEI), and Fe3O4 to removal hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) from water and soil. Therein, GO was functionalized with plenty of -NH2 by the modification of PEI through an amidation reaction, and the resulting GO/PEI reacted with FeSO4 center dot 7H(2)O and NaBH4 to obtain RGO/PEI/Fe3O4 (the optimal one is designated as ORPF) through an oxidation- reduction reaction. ORPF could effectively adsorb Cr(VI) through electrostatic attraction, and the adsorbed Cr(VI) ions were partially reduced to trivalent chromium (Cr(III)) with low toxicity by RGO (pi electron). Afterward, the resulting ORPF-Cr could be conveniently removed from water with a magnet, achieving the maximum Cr(VI) removal capacity of 266.6 mg/g. Importantly, ORPF, once carried by sponge particles, could efficiently remove Cr(VI) from soil, and the resulting mixture could be facilely collected with a magnet on a filter net. Besides, the leaching experiment suggested that, when supported by filter paper, ORPF was able to decrease the number of leached Cr(VI) ions and meanwhile reduce them to Cr(III). This work provides a promising approach to remediate Cr(VI))-contaminated water and soil using a nanocomposite, Which has a huge number of application prospects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据