4.6 Article

Ion Exchange Thermodynamics at the Rutile-Water Interface: Flow Microcalorimetric Measurements and Surface Complexation Modeling of Na-K-Rb-Cl-NO3 Adsorption

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 33, 期 20, 页码 4934-4941

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b00867

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences Division [211267]
  2. Division of Chemical Sciences, Geoscience and Biosciences, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Flow microcalorimetry was used to investigate the energetics associated with Rb+, K+ , Na+, Cl-, and NO3- exchange at the rutile-water interface. Heats of exchange reflected differences in bulk hydration/dehydration enthalpies (Na+ > K+ > Rb+, and Cl- > NO3-) such that exchanging Na or Clfrom the surface was exothermic, reflecting their greater bulk hydration enthalpies. Exchange heats were measured at pH 2, 3.25, 5.8, and 11 and exhibited considerable differences as well as pH dependence. These trends were rationalized with the aid of a molecularly constrained surface complexation model (SCM) that incorporated the inner-sphere binding observed for the cations on the rutile (110) surface. Explicitly accounting for the inner-sphere binding configuration differences between Rb+, K+, and Na+, as well as accompanying differences in negative surface charge development, resulted in much better agreement with measured exchange ratios than by considering bulk hydration enthalpies alone. The observation that calculated exchange ratios agreed with those measured experimentally lends additional credence to the SCM. Consequently, flow microcalorimetry and surface complexation modeling are a useful complement of techniques for probing the energetics associated with ion exchange and adsorption processes and should also serve to help validate molecular simulations of interfacial energetics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据