4.0 Article

Environmental Noise around Hospital Areas: A Case Study

期刊

ENVIRONMENTS
卷 6, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/environments6040041

关键词

urban noise; noise measurements; environmental quality; urban planning; action plan; noise mitigation; health centre

资金

  1. Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER)/European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)
  2. European Union, European Social Fund (ESF)
  3. Consejeria de Economia e Infraestructuras of Junta de Extremadura [PO17014, GR18107]
  4. Juan de la Cierva-Incorporacion contract from the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness [IJCI-2016-28923]
  5. Consejeria de Sanidad y Consumo of Junta de Extremadura

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Due to the particular characteristics of hospitals, these buildings are highly sensitive to environmental noise. However, they are usually located close or within urban agglomerations. Hence, hospitals are, in many cases, exposed to high levels of environmental noise. A study of one of the main hospitals in the Extremadura region (Spain) is presented here to allow a global assessment of the acoustic impact of outdoor sound sources. Both long- and short-term measurements were carried out, and a software model was developed. The measured values exceed the World Health Organisation reference value of 50 dBA for daytime and evening, and are even higher than the 55 dBA limit at which severe annoyance is generated. Taking into account the results obtained, the noise impact on this hospital is primarily influenced by three sound sources: road traffic, cooling towers of the hospital and the emergency helicopter. Their relative importance depends on the facade under consideration. It can therefore be concluded that the overall situation of the hospital needs to be improved. Thus, a series of solutions are proposed for a possible action plan based on interventions regarding the main sound sources and the location of the most sensitive areas to environmental noise.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据