4.4 Article

Synthetic modification and cytotoxic evaluation of 2-cyano-3,4-secotriterpenic methylketones

期刊

CHEMICAL PAPERS
卷 73, 期 7, 页码 1767-1775

出版社

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/s11696-019-00729-6

关键词

3; 4-secotriterpenoids; Methylketones; Nitrile anion cyclization; Cytotoxicity; MTT test; SAR

资金

  1. Russian Science Foundation [16-13-10245]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [16-13-10245] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Triterpenic methylketones, known earlier and obtainable as a result of oxidative transformation of double bond(s) in 2-cyano-3,4-secoderivatives of the lupane and 18H-oleanane types, can be regarded as promising intermediates for synthetic transformation. This study has demonstrated the acid-catalyzed -bromination of methylketones as capable of providing a series of various bromine-substituted ketones with different degrees of halogenation, as well as the 3,23,24-trinor-3,4-seco-18H-oleanane acid resulting from the tribromoketone by elimination of a bromoform fragment under the same conditions. The 3,4-seco-acid ester derivative was then transformed, via the base-catalyzed intramolecular nitrile anion cyclization, to a derivative with the ketonitrile fragment in the five-membered A cycle, dehydrogenation of which afforded a cyano enone derivative. With use of the base catalysis, the 3,4-secotriterpenic bromohydrins synthesized via stereoselective reduction of 18H-oleanane mono- and dibromoketones were transformed to C(4) epimeric terminal 4,23-epoxides. According to cytotoxic screening of the synthesized compounds, the bromoketones showed the most pronounced cytotoxic effect, whereas their derivatives partially or completely lost their cytotoxicity against the tumor cell lines under MTT test. The IC50 values characterizing the proliferation inhibition of HCT116, MS, RD TE32, and PC3 cells for the most active 2-cyano-24,24-dibromo-19,28-epoxy-3,4-seco-3,23-dinor-18H-olean-4-one 7 spanned the range 2.06-7.51M.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据