4.5 Article

Sign Tracking and Goal Tracking Are Characterized by Distinct Patterns of Nucleus Accumbens Activity

期刊

ENEURO
卷 6, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0414-18.2019

关键词

goal tracking; nucleus accumbens; Pavlovian conditioning; reinforcement learning; sign tracking

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R03DA045913]
  2. University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Competitive Medical Research Fund Award
  3. Brain AMP
  4. Behavior Research Organization [25185]
  5. Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences, University of Pittsburgh

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During Pavlovian conditioning, if a cue (e.g., lever extension) predicts reward delivery in a different location (e.g., a food magazine), some individuals will come to approach and interact with the cue, a behavior known as sign tracking (ST), and others will approach the site of reward, a behavior known as goal tracking (GT). In rats, the acquisition of ST versus GT behavior is associated with distinct profiles of dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens (NAc), but it is unknown whether it is associated with different patterns of accumbens neural activity. Therefore, we recorded from individual neurons in the NAc core during the acquisition, maintenance, and extinction of ST and GT behavior. Even though NAc dopamine is specifically important for the acquisition and expression of ST, we found that cue-evoked excitatory responses encode the vigor of both ST and GT behavior. In contrast, among sign trackers only, there was a prominent decrease in reward-related activity over the course of training, which may reflect the decreasing reward prediction error encoded by phasic dopamine. Finally, both behavior and cue-evoked activity were relatively resistant to extinction in sign trackers, as compared with goal trackers, although a subset of neurons in both groups retained their cue-evoked responses. Overall, the results point to the convergence of multiple forms of reward learning in the NAc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据