4.8 Review

Recent progress in covalent organic framework thin films: fabrications, applications and perspectives

期刊

CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS
卷 48, 期 2, 页码 488-516

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8cs00376a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Program for the National Natural Science Foundation of China [81773333, 51521006, 51709101, 51779090, 51579098, 51408206, 51508177, 51579096]
  2. National Program for Support of Top-Notch Young Professionals of China
  3. Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Plan Project [2016RS3026, 2017SK2241]
  4. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT-13R17]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As a newly emerging class of porous materials, covalent organic frameworks (COFs) have attracted much attention due to their intriguing structural merits (e.g., total organic backbone, tunable porosity and predictable structure). However, the insoluble and unprocessable features of bulk COF powder limit their applications. To overcome these limitations, considerable efforts have been devoted to exploring the fabrication of COF thin films with controllable architectures, which open the door for their novel applications. In this critical review, we aim to provide the recent advances in the fabrication of COF thin films not only supported on substrates but also as free-standing nanosheets via both bottom-up and top-down strategies. The bottom-up strategy involves solvothermal synthesis, interfacial polymerization, room temperature vapor-assisted conversion, and synthesis under continuous flow conditions; whereas, the top-down strategy involves solvent-assisted exfoliation, self-exfoliation, mechanical delamination, and chemical exfoliation. In addition, the applications of COF thin films including energy storage, semiconductor devices, membrane-separation, sensors, and drug delivery are summarized. Finally, to accelerate further research, a personal perspective covering their synthetic strategies, mechanisms and applications is presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据