4.7 Article

Green streets - Quantifying and mapping urban trees with street-level imagery and computer vision

期刊

LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
卷 165, 期 -, 页码 93-101

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.05.010

关键词

Urban trees; Computer vision; Streetscapes; Tree cover; Greenspace

资金

  1. Fonds de recherche du Quebec - Nature et technologies (FRQNT)
  2. Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Metropolitan Solutions (AMS)
  3. Allianz
  4. Ericsson
  5. Liberty Mutual Research Institute
  6. Philips
  7. Kuwait-MIT Center for Natural Resources and the Environment
  8. Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology (SMART)
  9. Societe nationale des chemins de fer francais (SNCF)
  10. UBER
  11. Volkswagen Electronics Research Laboratory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Traditional tools to map the distribution of urban green space have been hindered by either high cost and labour inputs or poor spatial resolution given the complex spatial structure of urban landscapes. What's more, those tools do not observe the urban landscape from a perspective in which citizens experience a city. We test a novel application of computer vision to quantify urban tree cover at the street-level. We do so by utilizing the open source image data of city streetscapes that is now abundant (Google Street View). We show that a multi-step computer vision algorithm segments and quantifies the percent of tree cover in streetscape images to a high degree of precision. By then modelling the relationship between neighbouring images along city street segments, we are able to extend this image representation and estimate the amount of perceived tree cover in city streetscapes to a relatively high level of accuracy for an entire city. Though not a replacement for high resolution remote sensing (e.g., aerial LiDAR) or intensive field surveys, the method provides a new multi-feature metric of urban tree cover that quantifies tree presence and distribution from the same viewpoint in which citizens experience and see the urban landscape.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据