4.6 Article

MAPPING LAND SUITABILITY FOR AGRICULTURE IN MALAWI

期刊

LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT
卷 28, 期 7, 页码 2001-2016

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ldr.2723

关键词

land suitability; spatial models; sustainable agriculture; soil rehabilitation; Malawi

资金

  1. Zhejiang A F University [2013FR052]
  2. Project Perennial Grain Crops for African Smallholder Farming Systems - Bill AMP
  3. Melinda Gates Foundation through United States Agency for International Development [OPP1076311, AID-OAA-A-13-00006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Population growth, climate sensitivity, and edaphic properties are important factors that influence decision-making and risk mitigation for agricultural production. Within the agricultural sector in Malawi, continuous cropping without the use of long-term sustainable strategies and frequent cultivation on marginal lands have resulted in continually declining soil fertility. Improving soil quality of marginal lands using innovative technologies is imperative for increasing agricultural productivity and improving food security. Here, we propose an ensemble approach to map agricultural land suitability and identify the distribution of marginal land in Malawi. Quantitative data available for eight soil and terrain factors were rated individually, and five distinct models were applied to generate a spatial distribution map of land suitability. The results indicate that highly suitable, moderately suitable, marginally suitable, and unsuitable agricultural areas account for 8.2%, 24.1%, 28.0%, and 39.7% of the total land area, respectively. The majority of suitable lands are currently used for agriculture, but more than half (57.4%) of Malawi's total cropland exists on marginally suitable or unsuitable land categories and is likely a candidate for rehabilitation through sustainable agricultural practices. The methods and products herein will be valuable resources for effectively managing and improving Malawi's agricultural lands for increasing food security. Copyright (c) 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据