4.5 Article

Assessing Reef-Island Shoreline Change Using UAV-Derived Orthomosaics and Digital Surface Models

期刊

DRONES
卷 3, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/drones3020044

关键词

UAVs; drones; reef islands; structure-from-motion; geomorphic change; vulnerability

资金

  1. Faculty of Science, Medicine, and Health
  2. GeoQuest Research Centre at the University of Wollongong, Australia
  3. Australian Government Research Training Program
  4. Geological Society of Australia PhD Endowment Fund
  5. Ministry of Education Malaysia scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents an analysis of shoreline change on reef islands using unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-derived orthomosaics and digital surface models (DSMs) collected on Sipadan Island, Sabah, Malaysia, and Sasahura Ite Island, Isabel Province, Solomon Islands. The high resolution of UAV-derived orthomosaics enabled changes in the position of the base of beach to be detected with confidence. The accuracy of the UAV-derived DSMs was assessed against equivalent topographic profiles via root-mean-square error, and found to be <0.21 m in all but one case; this demonstrates the potential for using UAV-derived DSMs to interpret three-dimensional island beach morphology and detect patterns of geomorphic change. The correlation between planimetric and volumetric change along selected beach transects was also investigated and found to be variable, indicating that a multifaceted approach including both planimetric (two-dimensional) and volumetric (three-dimensional) metrics is of value when analysing reef-island change. However, interpretations of UAV-derived data must carefully consider errors associated with global positioning system (GPS) positioning, the distribution of ground control points, the chosen UAV flight parameters, and the data processing methodology. Further application of this technology has the potential to expand our understanding of reef-island morphodynamics and their vulnerability to sea-level rise and other stressors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据