4.3 Article

Group Decision Making with Heterogeneous Preference Structures: An Automatic Mechanism to Support Consensus Reaching

期刊

GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION
卷 28, 期 3, 页码 585-617

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10726-018-09609-y

关键词

Group decision and negotiation; Heterogeneous preference structures; Consensus; Information loss

资金

  1. NSF of China [71871149, 71571124]
  2. Sichuan University [sksyl201705, 2018hhs-58]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [TIN2016-75850-R]
  4. FEDER funds

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In real-world decision problems, decision makers usually express their opinions with different preference structures. In order to deal with the heterogeneous preference information in group decision making, this paper presents an optimization-based consensus model for group decision making with heterogeneous preference structures (utility values, preference orderings, multiplicative preference relations and additive preference relations). This proposal seeks to minimize the information loss between decision makers' heterogeneous preference information and individual preference vectors and also seeks the collective solution with a consensus. Meanwhile, in order to justify the consensus model, we discuss its internal aggregation operator between the obtained individual and group preference vectors, demonstrate that the proposed model satisfies the Pareto principle of social choice theory, and prove the uniqueness of the solution to the optimization model. Furthermore, based on the proposed optimization-based consensus model, we present an automatic mechanism to support consensus reaching in the group decision making with heterogeneous preference structures. In the consensus reaching process, the obtained individual and group preference vectors are considered as a decision aid which decision makers can use as a reference to adjust their preference opinions. Finally, detailed simulation experiments and comparison analysis are conducted to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of our proposed model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据