4.8 Article

A facile ionic liquid approach to prepare cellulose- rich aerogels directly from corn stalks

期刊

GREEN CHEMISTRY
卷 21, 期 10, 页码 2699-2708

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9gc00282k

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2015CB251401]
  2. Major Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [21890762]
  3. National Natural Scientific Fund of China [21878292, 21878314, 21606240]
  4. K. C. Wong Education Foundation
  5. Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Science [XDA21060300]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aerogels derived from corn stalks are promising materials for wide use, due to their biodegradability and biocompatibility. However, preparation of cellulose-rich aerogels directly from corn stalks is a tedious and complicated process. In this study, generation of cellulose-rich aerogels was achieved by a facile approach relying on an ionic liquid and amido-sulfonic acid used as solvents. By this method, cellulose-rich aerogels were directly obtained from corn stalks through a process whereby lignin was separated from the other components of the corn stalks in one step, an approach simplifying the traditional fabrication processes. The composition, morphology and thermal stability of the obtained aerogels were investigated as they were related to the ionic liquid solvent systems used. Furthermore, the dye adsorption mechanism of cellulose-rich aerogels was simulated. In the most favourable case, the obtained aerogel was free of lignin and had the cellulose content as high as 88.1%. In addition, the aerogel possessed a porous three-dimensional structure with a high specific area (201 m(2) g(-1)) and good thermal stability. Owing to its excellent properties, this cellulose-rich porous aerogel is expected to have a potential use in dye adsorption and other fields. This aerogel displayed an absorption capacity of 549 mg g(-1) for Congo red and 302 mg g(-1) for Coomassie brilliant blue.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据