4.5 Article

A portable dual-smog-chamber system for atmospheric aerosol field studies

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES
卷 12, 期 5, 页码 2733-2743

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/amt-12-2733-2019

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council Project ATMOPACS (Atmospheric Organic Particulate Matter, Air Quality and Climate Change Studies) [267099]
  2. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program through the EUROCHAMP-2020 Infrastructure Activity [730997]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [267099] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Smog chamber experiments using ambient air as a starting point can improve our understanding of the evolution of atmospheric particulate matter at timescales longer than those achieved by traditional laboratory experiments. These types of studies can take place under more realistic environmental conditions addressing the interactions among multiple pollutants. The use of two identical smog chambers, with the first serving as the baseline chamber and the second as the perturbation chamber (in which addition or removal of pollutants, addition of oxidants, change in the relative humidity, etc.), can facilitate the interpretation of the results in such inherently complex experiments. The differences of the measurements in the two chambers can be used as the basis for the analysis of the corresponding chemical or physical processes of ambient air. A portable dual-smog-chamber system was developed using two identical pillow-shaped smog chambers (1.5m(3) each). The two chambers are surrounded by UV lamps in a hexagonal arrangement yielding a total J(NO2) of 0.1 min(-1). The system can be easily disassembled and transported, enabling the study of various atmospheric environments. Moreover, it can be used with natural sunlight. The results of test experiments using ambient air as the starting point are discussed as examples of applications of this system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据