4.4 Article

Principal Stress Rotation under Bidirectional Simple Shear Loadings

期刊

KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
卷 22, 期 5, 页码 1651-1660

出版社

KOREAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-KSCE
DOI: 10.1007/s12205-017-0822-4

关键词

Principal stress rotation; noncoaxial behavior; simple shear; sand; orientation of principal stress

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51708040/11172312/A020311]
  2. International Doctoral Innovation Centre (IDIC)
  3. Ningbo Education Bureau
  4. Ningbo Science and Technology Bureau
  5. China's MoST
  6. University of Nottingham
  7. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/L015463/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous researches have indicated the non-coaxiality of sand in unidirectional simple shear tests, in which the direction of the principal axes of stresses does not coincide with the corresponding principal axes of strain rate tensors. Due to the limitation of apparatus that most of testing facilities can only add shear stress in one direction, the influence of stress history on the noncoaxiality of sand is not fully considered in previous tests. In this study, the effect of stress history on the non-coaxiality of sand is systematically studied by using the first commercially available Variable Direction Dynamic Cyclic Simple Shear system (VDDCSS). Samples of Leighton Buzzard sand (Fraction B) are first consolidated under a vertical confining stress and consolidation shear stress, and then sheared by a drained monotonic shear stress. Angle (theta) between the consolidation shear stress and the drained monotonic shear stress is varied from 0 degrees to 180 degrees, with an interval of 30 degrees. The change of principal axes of stresses is predicted by well-established equations, and the principal axe of strain rate is calculated using recorded data. Results show that the level of non-coaxiality is increased by the increasing theta, especially at the initial stage of drained shearing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据