4.7 Article

The Local Perspective on the Hubble Tension: Local Structure Does Not Impact Measurement of the Hubble Constant

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 875, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0ebf

关键词

cosmology:observations; distance scale; large-scale structure of universe; supernovae: general

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We use the largest sample to date of spectroscopic supernova (SN) Ia distances and redshifts to look for evidence in the Hubble diagram of large-scale outflows caused by local voids suggested to exist at z < 0.15. Our sample combines data from the Pantheon sample with the Foundation survey, and the most recent release of light curves from the Carnegie Supernova Project, to create a sample of 1295 SNe over a redshift range of 0.01 < z < 2.26. We make use of an inhomogeneous and isotropic Lemaitre-Tolman-Bondi metric to model a void in the SN Ia distance-redshift relation. We conclude that the SN luminosity distance-redshift relation is inconsistent at the 4-5 sigma confidence level with large local underdensities (vertical bar delta vertical bar > 20%, where the density contrast delta = Delta rho/rho) proposed in some galaxy count studies, and find no evidence of a change in the Hubble constant corresponding to a void with a sharp edge in the redshift range 0.023 < z < 0.15. With an empirical precision of sigma(H0) = 0.60%, we conclude that the distance ladder measurement is not affected by local density contrasts, in agreement with a cosmic variance of sigma(H0) = 0.42%, predicted from simulations of large-scale structure. Given that uncertainty in the distance ladder value is sigma(H0 )= 2.2%, this does not affect the Hubble tension. We derive a 5 sigma constraint on local density contrasts on scales larger than 69 Mpc h(-1 )of vertical bar delta vertical bar < 27%. The presence of local structure does not appear to impede the possibility of measuring the Hubble constant to 1% precision.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据