4.3 Article

ACL graft metabolic activity assessed by 18FDG PET-MRI

期刊

KNEE
卷 24, 期 4, 页码 792-797

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2017.04.008

关键词

ACL reconstruction; Ligamentization; Magnetic resonance imaging; Positron emission tomography; (18)FDG

资金

  1. Ohio Third Frontier grants [TECH 09-028, TECH 10-012, TECH 11-044, TECH 13-060]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: To demonstrate the use of (18)Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in combination ((18)FDG-PET) to assess the metabolic activity of ACL graft tissue and evaluate the utility of this technique for ligament imaging. Methods: Twenty-one knees with intact ACL grafts in 19 patients at multiple time points following ACL reconstruction were recruited to participate. PET-MRI imaging was performed using a custom device to place knees in the same position for both studies. Images were co-registered for quantification of (18)FDG-PET standardized uptake value (SUV) for the proximal, middle, and distal ACL was quantified. Signal in extra-articular muscle tissue in the index knee was also recorded as a control. Signal from each location was compared based on how far post-operative each knee was from ACL reconstruction (<6 months, six to 12 months, 12-24 months, or >24 months). Results: Significant differences in (18)FDG PET SUV between the four time points were observed in the proximal (p = 0.02), middle (p = 0.004), and distal (p = 0.007) portions of the ACL graft. The greater than 24 months group was noted to be different from other groups in each case. No difference in PET 18FDG SUV was noted in the extra-articular muscle in the index knee in each time group (p = 0.61). Conclusions: Metabolic activity was noted to be significantly lower in grafts imaged greater than two years post-reconstruction relative to those grafts that had been in place for shorter periods of time. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据