4.7 Article

Tubulointerstitial fibrosis can sensitize the kidney to subsequent glomerular injury

期刊

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
卷 92, 期 6, 页码 1395-1403

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2017.04.010

关键词

atubular glomeruli; glomerular injury; tubuloglomerular feed-back; tubulointerstitial fibrosis

资金

  1. NIH NIDDK [DK56942-09, DK095785, DK62794]
  2. VA Merit grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic glomerular injury is associated with eventual development of tubulointerstitial fibrosis. Here we aimed to assess whether, and how, mild chronic tubulointerstitial injury affects glomeruli. For this, we generated mice expressing different toxin receptors, one on their proximal tubular epithelial cells (diphtheria toxin receptor [DTR]) and the other only on podocytes (human CD25 [IL-2R] driven by the nephrin promoter [Nep25]), allowing serial induction of tubule-specific and glomerular (podocyte)-specific injury, respectively. Six weeks after diphtheria toxin injection, mild interstitial fibrosis was found in Nep25(+)/DTR+, but not in Nep25(+)/DTR- mice. However, atubular glomeruli and neuronal nitric oxide synthase, a mediator of tubuloglomerular feedback, were higher in Nep25(+)/DTR+ than in DTR- mice and these atubular glomeruli had less podocyte density as assessed by WT-1 biomarker expression. Peritubular capillary density, hypoxia-inducible factor-1 and -2, and cyclooxygenase 2 expression were similar at week six in the two groups. At week seven, all mice were given the immunotoxin LMB-2, which binds to CD25 to induce podocyte injury. Ten days later, proteinuria, podocyte injury, and glomerulosclerosis were more severe in Nep25(+)/DTR+ than Nep25D/DTR-mice with more severe sclerosis in the tubule-connected glomeruli. This supports the concept that even mild preexisting tubulointerstitial injury sensitizes glomeruli to subsequent podocyte-specific injury. Thus, increased atubular glomeruli and abnormal tubuloglomerular feedback significantly contribute to the crosstalk between the tubulointerstitium and glomeruli.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据