4.6 Article

Quantitative assessment model of ecological vulnerability of the Silk Road Economic Belt, China, utilizing remote sensing based on the partition-integration concept

期刊

GEOMATICS NATURAL HAZARDS & RISK
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 1346-1366

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/19475705.2019.1568313

关键词

Ecological vulnerability; remote sensing; quantitative assessment; partition-integration; Silk Road Economic Belt

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2018BD001]
  2. Open Fund of the Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science (Ministry of Education), East China Normal University [KLGIS2017A02]
  3. Open Fund of State Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University [17I04]
  4. Project of Shandong Province Higher Educational Science and Technology Program [J18KA181]
  5. Project of Hubei Key Laboratory of Regional Development and Environmental Response (Hubei University) [2017(B)003]
  6. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFA0604804]
  7. Initial Scientific Research Fund of doctor in Shandong University of Technology [4041/416027]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The various patterns of spatial heterogeneity in the eco-environment of the Silk Road Economic Belt of China differ greatly. In this study, a partition-integration concept was introduced to assess the ecological vulnerability of the Silk Road Economic Belt in China. To confirm the comparability of ecological vulnerability among different sub-regions, the net primary productivity (NPP) was utilized to determine the ecological vulnerability thresholds for different sub-regions. The results indicated that: (1) the new assessment model of ecological vulnerability based on the partition-integration concept was strongly operational and practical for the study region; (2) NPP was conducive to the continuous expression of ecological vulnerability, which can ensure better comparison and analysis of ecological vulnerability among the three sub-regions; (3) the spatial patterns of zones at different vulnerability levels differed greatly. The mild vulnerability zone was the most widely distributed, whereas the zone of slight vulnerability covered the smallest area. (4) Specific environmental protection and treatment measures should be conducted in the three sub-regions with different dominant ecological problems. These results can provide decision-making support in realizing the great strategy of the one belt and one road idea.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据