4.7 Article

Association Between Subjective Sleep Quality and Future Risk of Falls in Older People: Results From LOHAS

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glx123

关键词

Falls; Sleep; Primary care; Cohort study

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Inadequate sleep is correlated with morbidity and mortality among older adults. However, the longitudinal relationship between subjective sleep quality and risk of falls in the elderly population remains to be clarified. Methods: Study participants were from Locomotive Syndrome and Health Outcome in Aizu Cohort Study (LOHAS) sites (1,071 community-dwelling people >= 65 years of age, mean: 71 years). Subjective sleep quality was measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Occurrence of falls (defined as experiencing at least one fall) during the subsequent year was ascertained by a self-reported questionnaire. Results: Mean global PSQI score was 4.3 (SD 3.2), with 28.9% of participants rating their sleep quality as poor (PSQI > 5). A total of 210 participants (19.6%) fell at least once in the year following sleep examination. Multivariable analysis revealed that participants reporting worse subjective sleep quality had significantly higher odds of experiencing falls during the 1-year follow-up period (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.50 for each three-point increase in global PSQI score; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.20, 1.89). Participants in the highest global PSQI score (PSQI > 5) quartile had significantly increased odds of experiencing falls compared to those in the lowest global score quartile (PSQI < 2; AOR = 2.14; 95% CI = 1.09, 4.22). This association was similarly significant in subgroup analyses for older men and women, nonusers of sleep medication, and those without a history of falls at baseline. Conclusion: Subjective poor sleep quality, as measured by the PSQI, is longitudinally associated with greater risk of experiencing falls in community-dwelling older adults.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据