3.8 Article

Prognostic Evaluation of Mortality after Pediatric Resuscitation Assisted by Extracorporeal Life Support

期刊

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC INTENSIVE CARE
卷 8, 期 2, 页码 57-63

出版社

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1667012

关键词

extracorporeal life support; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; prognostic factors; children

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To improve survival rates during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), some patients are put on extracorporeal life support (ECLS) during active resuscitation (ECPR). Our objective was to assess the clinical outcomes after pediatric ECPR in Switzerland and to determine pre-ECPR prognostic factors formortality. The present study is a retrospective analysis. The study setting included three pediatric intensive care units in Switzerland that use ECPR. All patients (< 16 years old) undergoing ECPR from 2008 to 2016 were included in the study. There were no interventions. Data before ECLS initiation and clinical outcomes were collected. An ECPR scorewas designed to predict mortality, based on variables significantly different between survivors and non-survivors. Fifty-five patients were included, with a median age of 13.5 months. Eighty percent were cardiac patients. The mortality rate was 75%. Mortality was significantly associated with CPR duration (p = 0.02), last lactate (p = 0.05), and last pH (p = 0.01) before ECLS initiation. Based on these three variables, an ECPR score was designed as follows: CPR duration (in minutes): 1 point if < 40; 2 points if >= 40; 3 points if >= 60; 6 points if >= 105. Lactate (inmmol/L): 1 point if < 8; 2 points if >= 8; 3 points if >= 14; 6 points if >= 18. pH: 1 point if > 7.00; 2 points if <= 7.00; 3 points if <= 6.85; 6 points if <= 6.60. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.74. The positive predictive value of a score >= 9 was 94%. In our population, a score based on three variables easily available prior to ECLS initiation had good discrimination and could appropriately predict mortality. This score now needs validation in a larger population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据