4.5 Article

Pulmonary outcomes in adults with a history of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia differ from patients with asthma

期刊

RESPIRATORY RESEARCH
卷 20, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12931-019-1075-1

关键词

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia; Adults; Astma; Lung function tests; Oscillometry; Spirometry; Multiple breath washout; HRLQoL

资金

  1. Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation
  2. Swedish Research Council
  3. King Oscar II Jubilee Foundation
  4. Swedish Asthma and Allergy Foundation
  5. Swedish Respiratory Society
  6. Hesselman Foundation
  7. Karolinska Institutet
  8. Stockholm County Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundBronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is a risk factor for respiratory disease in adulthood. Despite the differences in underlying pathology, patients with a history of BPD are often treated as asthmatics. We hypothesized that pulmonary outcomes and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were different in adults born preterm with and without a history of BPD compared to asthmatics and healthy individuals.MethodsWe evaluated 96 young adults from the LUNAPRE cohort (clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02923648), including 26 individuals born preterm with a history of BPD (BPD), 23 born preterm without BPD (preterm), 23 asthmatics and 24 healthy controls. Extensive lung function testing and HRQoL were assessed.ResultsThe BPD group had more severe airway obstruction compared to the preterm-, (FEV(1-)0.94 vs. 0.28 z-scores; p0.001); asthmatic- (0.14 z-scores, p0.01) and healthy groups (0.78 z-scores, p0.001). Further, they had increased ventilation inhomogeneity compared to the preterm- (LCI 6.97 vs. 6.73, p0.05), asthmatic- (6.75, p=0.05) and healthy groups (6.50 p0.001). Both preterm groups had lower D-LCO compared to healthy controls (p0.001 for both). HRQoL showed less physical but more psychological symptoms in the BPD group compared to asthmatics.ConclusionsLung function impairment and HRQoL in adults with a history of BPD differed from that in asthmatics highlighting the need for objective assessment of lung health.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据