4.5 Article

Risk factors for diagnostic delay in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

期刊

RESPIRATORY RESEARCH
卷 20, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12931-019-1076-0

关键词

IPF; Diagnosis; Delay; Cohort; Observational

资金

  1. P.A. Messerschmidt og Hustrus Fond
  2. Roche a/s
  3. Skibsreder Per Henriksen, R. og Hustrus Fond

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundSurveys and retrospective studies of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) have shown a significant diagnostic delay. However, the causes and risk factors for this delay are not known.MethodsDates at six time points before the IPF diagnosis (onset of symptoms, first contact to a general practitioner, first hospital contact, referral to an interstitial lung disease (ILD) centre, first visit at an ILD centre, and final diagnosis) were recorded in a multicentre cohort of 204 incident IPF patients. Based on these dates, the delay was divided into specific patient-related and healthcare-related delays. Demographic and clinical data were used to determine risk factors for a prolonged delay, using multivariate negative binomial regression analysis.ResultsThe median diagnostic delay was 2.1years (IQR: 0.9-5.0), mainly attributable to the patients, general practitioners and community hospitals. Male sex was a risk factor for patient delay (IRR: 3.84, 95% CI: 1.17-11.36, p=0.006) and old age was a risk factor for healthcare delay (IRR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.06, p=0.004). The total delay was prolonged in previous users of inhalation therapy (IRR: 1.99, 95% CI: 1.40-2.88, p<0.0001) but not in patients with airway obstruction. Misdiagnosis of respiratory symptoms was reported by 41% of all patients.ConclusionDespite increased awareness of IPF, the diagnostic delay is still 2.1years. Male sex, older age and treatment attempts for alternative diagnoses are risk factors for a delayed diagnosis of IPF. Efforts to reduce the diagnostic delay should focus on these risk factors.Trial registrationThis study was registered at http://clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02772549) on May 10, 2016.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据