4.3 Article

The terminal velocity of volcanic particles with shape obtained from 3D X-ray microtomography

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2016.11.013

关键词

3D Sphericity; 3D Fractal dimension; Particle shape; Fluid drag; X-ray micro-tomography; Terminal velocity

资金

  1. PON Ricerca e Competitivita
  2. NERC [bgs05003] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [bgs05003] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

New experiments of falling volcanic particles were performed in order to define terminal velocity models applicable in a wide range of Reynolds number Re. Experiments were carried out with fluids of various viscosities and with particles that cover a wide range of size, density and shape. Particle shape, which strongly influences fluid drag, was measured in 3D by High-resolution X-ray microtomography, by which sphericity Phi(3D) and fractal dimension D-3D were obtained. They are easier to measure and less operator dependent than the 2D shape parameters used in previous papers. Drag laws that make use of the new 3D parameters were obtained by fitting particle data to the experiments, and single-equation terminal velocity models were derived. They work well both at high and low Re (3 x 10(-2) <10(4)), while earlier formulations made use of different equations at different ranges of Re. The new drag laws are well suited for the modelling of particle transportation both in the eruptive column, where coarse and fine particles are present, and also in the distal part of the umbrella region, where fine ash is involved in the large-scale domains of atmospheric circulation. A table of the typical values of Phi(3D) and D-3D of particles from known plinian, subplinian and ash plume eruptions is presented. Graphs of terminal velocity as a function of grain size are finally proposed as tools to help volcanologists and atmosphere scientists to model particle transportation of explosive eruptions. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据