4.5 Article

Gasification reactivity and synergistic effect of conventional and microwave pyrolysis derived algae chars in CO2 atmosphere

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ENERGY INSTITUTE
卷 92, 期 3, 页码 730-740

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.joei.2018.02.009

关键词

CO2 gasification reactivity; Synergistic effect; Algae char; Microwave pyrolysis; Kinetics

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFB0602602, 2017YFC0210400]
  2. University of Nottingham Ningbo China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research focuses on the isothermal and non-isothermal CO2 gasification of an algal (Chlorella) char prepared via two different thermal processing systems, i.e. conventional and microwave-assisted pyrolysis. It was found that chars prepared via microwave irradiation showed higher CO2 gasification reactivity than that of chars prepared via the conventional method. Meanwhile, the activation energy of microwave char was found to be 127.89 kJ/mol, which was 46.3 kJ/mol lower than that of conventional char, indicating improved reactivity of microwave char. The systematic characterisation of both conventional and microwave chars shows that the higher reactivity of microwave char could be attributed to its large BET surface area, low crystalline index and high active sites. In addition, it was found that microwave heating contributed to high reactivity of chars through generating large amount of primary char, the formation of hot spot and high specific surface area and pore volume. Results of co-gasification under isothermal conditions revealed the existence of greater synergistic effects between coal char and microwave algae char than those of coal char and conventional algae char. Furthermore, based on the relative Rs (average gasification rate), a novel index proposed to quantify the interactions in co-gasification process, Australian coal char microwave assisted char blend experienced 10% higher interactions compared to Australian coal char/conventional assisted char blend. (C) 2018 Energy Institute, Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据