4.7 Article

Iron-Doped Ni5P4 Ultrathin Nanoporous Nanosheets for Water Splitting and On-Demand Hydrogen Release via NaBH4 Hydrolysis

期刊

ACS APPLIED NANO MATERIALS
卷 2, 期 5, 页码 3091-3099

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.9b00441

关键词

Fe-doped Ni5P4; overall water splitting; hydrogen evolution reaction; oxygen evolution reaction; hydrolysis of NaBH4

资金

  1. Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences [BNLMS20160116]
  2. Key Laboratory of Microsystems and Microstructures Manufacturing of Ministry of Education, Harbin Institute of Technology [2015KM006]
  3. Heilongjiang Postdoctoral Foundation [LBH-Q16091]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The search for efficient overall water-splitting electrocatalysts plays an important role for low-cost hydrogen production. Metal phosphides are promising for integrating hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) properties in one bifunctional electrode, but several challenges still exist and need to be solved. We report a free-standing carbon cloth electrode consisting of iron (Fe)-doped Nisi), nanosheet arrays via a hydrothermal reaction and subsequent phosphorization, which effectively drives both HER and OER in the base. The as-prepared Fe-doped Ni5P4 with ultralow Fe conent (2.5 atom %) delivers a current density of 10 mA cm(-2) at 131 mV for HER and needs 257 mV to reach a current density of 100 mA cm(-2) for OER Overall, water splitting requires only 1.50 V to reach a current density of 10 mA cm(-2). The introduction of trace Fe in NisP(4) is effective to modulate the adsorption energy of the key intermediates for both HER and OER, which is promising for the rational design of transition-metal phosphides based on bifunctional water-splitting catalysts with high performance. In particular, Fe-doped NisP(4) could effectively catalyze the hydrolysis of NaBH4 with a hydrogen generation rate of 0.175 L g(-1) min(-1) and an activation energy of 53.41 kJ mol(-1), comparable to most transition-metal-based electrocatalysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据