4.3 Article

Short exposure to oxygen and sulfide alter nitrification, denitrification, and DNRA activity in seasonally hypoxic estuarine sediments

期刊

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY LETTERS
卷 366, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/femsle/fny288

关键词

nitrification; denitrification; dissimilatory nitrate reduction; estuary; oxygen; sulfide

资金

  1. European Commission [2112932-1]
  2. Danish Research Council [2112932-1]
  3. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  4. FORMAS [2112932-1]
  5. University ofWest Florida
  6. Center for Environmental and Climate Research
  7. Biodiversity and Ecosystem services in a Changing Climate at Lund University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increased organic loading to sediments from eutrophication often results in hypoxia, reduced nitrification and increased production of hydrogen sulfide, altering the balance between nitrogen removal and retention. We examined the effect of short-term exposure to various oxygen and sulfide concentrations on sediment nitrification, denitrification and DNRA from a chronically hypoxic basin in Roskilde Fjord, Denmark. Surprisingly, nitrification rates were highest in the hypoxic and anoxic treatments (about 5 mu mol cm(-3) d(-1)) and the high sulfide treatment was not significantly different than the oxic treatment. Denitrification in the hypoxic treatment was highest at 1.4 mu mol cm(-3) d(-1) and significantly higher than the high sulfide treatment. For DNRA, the rate in high sulfide treatment was 2 mu mol cm(-3) d(-1). This was significantly higher than all oxygen treatments that were near zero. In this system, nitrifiers rapidly recovered from conditions typically considered inhibiting, while denitrifiers had a more muted response. DNRA bacteria appear to depend on sulfide for nitrate reduction. Anammox was insignificant. Thus, in estuaries and coastal systems that experience short-term variations in oxygen and sulfide, capabilities of microbial communities are more diverse and tolerant of suboptimal conditions than some paradigms suggest.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据