4.5 Article

Herbivory and presence of a dominant competitor interactively affect salt marsh plant diversity

期刊

JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE
卷 28, 期 6, 页码 1178-1186

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jvs.12574

关键词

Competition; Diversity; Herbivory; Niche vs neutral processes; Salt marshes

资金

  1. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata
  2. CONICET
  3. ANPCyT
  4. CONICET (Argentina)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Question: Do herbivory and the presence of a dominant grass competitor interactively affect herbaceous communities and assembly rules in a SW Atlantic saltmarsh? Location: Upper saltmarsh, Mar Chiquita coastal lagoon, Argentina. Methods: We performed a field factorial experiment over 4 yr to evaluate the separate and interactive effects of (1) herbivory and (2) competition with the dominant grass species (i.e. Spartina densiflora) on the salt marsh subordinate plant community. The factorial design includes dominant grass removal and herbivory manipulation. Results: Our results show that herbivory and presence of the dominant competitor interactively affect subordinate plant cover and diversity. Results further indicate that, in the presence of the dominant competitor, patch-to-patch variation in subordinate species composition is lower than expected at random, a result consistent with the expected outcomes of deterministic exclusion following light competition. Removal of the dominant grass nevertheless led to patch-to-patch dissimilarity in subordinate species composition, far from the dissimilarity expected at random, indicating increased importance of deterministic processes that drive communities to diverge. Conclusion: Our results show that the conditional effect of herbivory on plant diversity can be determined by the presence of a single plant species. Dominant plant species, in addition, may not only affect plant species diversity by determining the number and identity of subordinate species in a given patch (i.e. alpha-diversity) but also by affecting spatial variability through habitat homogenization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据