4.6 Article

Cost-Efficient, Portable, and Custom Multi-Subject Electroencephalogram Recording System

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 56760-56769

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2914088

关键词

Brain-computer interface; electroencephalogram; event-related potential; multi-subject recording

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST 106-2628-E-110-002-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multi-subject electroencephalogram (EEG) computing has attracted increasing interest in recent years. Commercial EEG headsets often lead to a space-required or cost-expensive setup for obtaining simultaneous recordings of multiple subjects. The sparsity or immobility of their electrode placements may compromise their realistic applicability. Thus, this work developed a cost-efficient, portable, and customizable system to mitigate these constraints. The developed system implemented two core hardware infrastructures, including an event broadcaster and a dry electrode-compatible EEG amplifier by assembling entirely low-cost, off-the-shelf electronic components. The broadcaster allowed distribution of event markers to multiple EEG amplifiers concurrently, whereas the amplifier transmitted the digitized, event-synchronized EEG signals wirelessly. By conducting an oddball event-related potential (ERP) experiment with simultaneous recordings of three subjects on 10 days, the system reliably captured the time- and phase-locked ERP components (e.g., N100 and P300 amplitudes) by single-subject, multi-subject, and multi-day analytical approaches. The practicality and stability of the proposed system was empirically demonstrated in terms of the signal quality, EEG-event synchronization, and inter-amplifier coordination for a multi-subject setup. This work sheds light on how to economically facilitate and scale up multi-subject EEG computing for fundamental research and for brain-computer interface (BCI) applications in a larger subject population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据