4.6 Article

Perovskite Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3: a potential family of peculiar lead-free electrostrictors

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 7, 期 22, 页码 13658-13670

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9ta03140e

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51722208]
  2. Key Technologies Research and Development Program of Sichuan Province [2018JY0007]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2012017YJSY111, 2018YJSY009, 2018YJSY071]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For perovskite ferroelectric oxides, the composition-induced transition from ferroelectrics to relaxors can enhance their electrostrictive coefficient Q(33) remarkably, and has been attracting more and more attention in recent years. Achieving a larger electro-strain response is one of the most original driving forces for pursuing higher Q(33) values, while the two are often incompatible. Herein, taking the promising relaxor ferroelectric Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3 (NBT) as the research object, we report the excellent electrostriction-like electro-strain behaviors (0.41% <= S-uni <= 0.46%, 25 <= T <= 125 degrees C; S-uni exhibits only 2.23% decline after 105 cycles) together with a series of enhanced Q(33) values (0.029-0.047 m(4) C-2). Accompanied by the reconstruction of de-coupled A-O interactions, the electric-field-induced relaxor to ferroelectric state transition contributes to the superior electro-strain behaviors, while the enhanced Q(33) will greatly degenerate during this transition process. In contrast to the non-hysteretic electrostriction observed in linear dielectrics, for NBT-based relaxor ferroelectrics, the peculiar coexistence of ferroelectric in-phase a(0)a(0)c(+) and anti-phase a(-)a(-)a(-) tiltings is suggested to contribute to the enhanced electrostriction-like behaviors observed in this work. These observations indicate that NBT-based systems can be considered as a potential family of peculiar lead-free electrostrictors for application in the field of actuators.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据