4.7 Article

Synergies between mycorrhizal fungi and soil microbial communities increase plant nitrogen acquisition

期刊

COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY
卷 2, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s42003-019-0481-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. Cornell University's David R. Atkinson Center for a Sustainable Future
  2. NSF IGERT Program [DGE-0903371, DGE-1069193]
  3. NSF-BREAD [IOS-0965336]
  4. NSF GRFP [DGE-1144153]
  5. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research [DE-SC0018409]
  6. DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (DOE BER Office of Science) [DE-FC02-07ER64494]
  7. NSF Long-Term Ecological Research Program at the Kellogg Biological Station [DEB 1637653]
  8. Michigan State University AgBioResearch
  9. Swedish research council [VR-621-2014-5912]
  10. BECC environment
  11. DFG [MU 3021/4-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nitrogen availability often restricts primary productivity in terrestrial ecosystems. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi are ubiquitous symbionts of terrestrial plants and can improve plant nitrogen acquisition, but have a limited ability to access organic nitrogen. Although other soil biota mineralize organic nitrogen into bioavailable forms, they may simultaneously compete for nitrogen, with unknown consequences for plant nutrition. Here, we show that synergies between the mycorrhizal fungus Rhizophagus irregularis and soil microbial communities have a highly non-additive effect on nitrogen acquisition by the model grass Brachypodium distachyon. These multipartite microbial synergies result in a doubling of the nitrogen that mycorrhizal plants acquire from organic matter and a tenfold increase in nitrogen acquisition compared to non-mycorrhizal plants grown in the absence of soil microbial communities. This previously unquantified multipartite relationship may contribute to more than 70 Tg of annually assimilated plant nitrogen, thereby playing a critical role in global nutrient cycling and eco-system function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据