4.3 Article

A randomised trial of continuous skin-to-skin contact after preterm birth and the effects on salivary cortisol, parental stress, depression, and breastfeeding

期刊

EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
卷 91, 期 1, 页码 63-70

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2014.12.005

关键词

Cortisol; Kangaroo Mother Care; Neonatal Care; Preterm infants; Stress

资金

  1. County Council of Ostergotland [LiO-12134, LiO-17711, LiO-278801]
  2. South Sweden Nursing Society [SSSH-2008]
  3. Halsofonden [LiU-2009]
  4. Linkoping University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: To evaluate the effects of almost continuous skin-to-skin contact (SSC) on salivary cortisol, parental stress, parental depression, and breastfeeding. Study design: This is a randomised study engaging families of late preterm infants (32-35 weeks gestation). Salivary cortisol reactivity was measured in infants during a nappy change at one month corrected age, and in infants and mothers during still-face at four month corrected age. Both parents completed the Swedish Parenthood Stress Questionnaire (SPSQ) at one month and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) at one and four months. Ainsworth's sensitivity scale was used to control for parental sensitivity. Subjects: Thirty-seven families from two different neonatal care units in Sweden, randomised to either almost continuous SSC or standard care (SC). Results: Infants randomised to SSC had a lower salivary cortisol reactivity at one month (p = 0.01). There was a correlation between the mothers' and the preterm infants' salivary cortisol levels at four months in the SSC group (rho = 0.65, p = 0.005), but not in the SC group (rho = 0.14, p = 0.63). Fathers in SSC scored lower on the SPSQ sub-scale spouse relationship problems compared to fathers in SC (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Almost continuous SSC decreases infants' cortisol reactivity in response to handling, improves the concordance between mothers' and infants' salivary cortisol levels, and decreases fathers' experiences of spouse relationship problems. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据