4.8 Review

Design of moldable hydrogels for biomedical applications using dynamic covalent boronic esters

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY CHEMISTRY
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 16-33

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtchem.2018.12.001

关键词

Dynamic covalent chemistry; Adaptable polymer networks; Soft matter; Polymer engineering; Biomedical materials

资金

  1. ETH Zurich

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Traditional polymeric materials based on thermosets or thermoplastics are applied broadly as biomedical materials. While attractive for a range of applications, thermosets and thermoplastics can be limited by their relatively static materials properties. Recent efforts in materials design has focused on engineering responsive and adaptive networks based on dynamic covalent chemistries. Installing reversible chemistries within the network backbone enables breaking and reforming of bonds in the network and associated rearrangement of the material on experimental timescales. The complexation between boronic acids and diols to form reversible boronic esters has emerged as a safe and synthetically tractable dynamic covalent cross-linking motif for the design of stimuli-responsive biomedical materials. Here, we present an instructive review on the design of dynamic covalent networks and gels using boronic ester cross-links. We provide a detailed discussion of boronic ester chemistry with guidelines for tuning the binding based on synthetic modification. We explain how network topology and connectivity influence the macroscale properties of the assembled networks. In addition, we discuss how these design principles have been used in foundational and emerging biomedical applications of boronic ester-based hydrogels. The use of boronic esters as dynamic covalent cross-links will continue to produce materials with emergent dynamic properties, and the design principles presented here will aid in the fabrication of next-generation boronic ester-based biomaterials. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据