4.4 Review

A brief review on resistance to P2Y12 receptor antagonism in coronary artery disease

期刊

THROMBOSIS JOURNAL
卷 17, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12959-019-0197-5

关键词

P2Y12 receptor antagonists; Residual platelet reactivity; Clopidogrel; Prasugrel; Ticagrelor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundPlatelet inhibition is important for patients with coronary artery disease. When dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is required, a P2Y(12)-antagonist is usually recommended in addition to standard aspirin therapy. The most used P2Y(12)-antagonists are clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor. Despite DAPT, some patients experience adverse cardiovascular events, and insufficient platelet inhibition has been suggested as a possible cause. In the present review we have performed a literature search on prevalence, mechanisms and clinical implications of resistance to P2Y(12) inhibitors.MethodsThe PubMed database was searched for relevant papers and 11 meta-analyses were included. P2Y(12) resistance is measured by stimulating platelets with ADP ex vivo and the most used assays are vasodilator stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP), Multiplate, VerifyNow (VN) and light transmission aggregometry (LTA).Discussion/conclusionThe frequency of high platelet reactivity (HPR) during clopidogrel therapy is predicted to be 30%. Genetic polymorphisms and drug-drug interactions are discussed to explain a significant part of this inter-individual variation. HPR during prasugrel and ticagrelor treatment is estimated to be 3-15% and 0-3%, respectively. This lower frequency is explained by less complicated and more efficient generation of the active metabolite compared to clopidogrel. Meta-analyses do show a positive effect of adjusting standard clopidogrel treatment based on platelet function testing. Despite this, personalized therapy is not recommended because no large-scale RCT have shown any clinical benefit. For patients on prasugrel and ticagrelor, platelet function testing is not recommended due to low occurrence of HPR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据