4.7 Article

Low Electron Carrier Concentration Near the p-n Junction Interface: A Fundamental Factor Limiting Short-Circuit Current of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 Solar Cells

期刊

SOLAR RRL
卷 3, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/solr.201900057

关键词

carrier concentration; Cu(In; Ga)Se2 solar cell; heterojunction; short-circuit current

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61574059, 61722402, 91833302]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0700700]
  3. Shu-Guang program [15SG20]
  4. Fok Ying Tung Education Foundation [161060]
  5. CC of ECNU

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A spike-like conduction-band offset (CBO) in heterojunction solar cells is shown to limit the short-circuit current density (J(SC)) dramatically when the spike height is large. It is widely believed that the spike-like CBO produces a potential barrier, which resists the photogenerated carriers flowing through the junction interface and thus decreases J(SC). However, our device simulation studies on Cu(In,Ga)Se-2 (CIGS) solar cells reveal that a large spike-like CBO causes an extremely low electron carrier concentration in the near-interface region of the buffer layer, which is the major factor that limits the carrier transport and thus J(SC). If the near-interface electron concentration is increased, J(SC) can be increased despite the fact that the large spike-like CBO and potential barrier are still present. These results indicate that the near-interface electron concentration is the fundamental factor limiting the J(SC), more fundamental than the potential barrier. Therefore, not only the commonly adopted band-alignment engineering, but also various other methods, for example, choosing buffer materials with suitable effective density of states, introducing favorable interface defects, or increasing the doping level, can be adopted for improving the current collection in heterojunction solar cells. Therefore, J(SC) can always be increased even when the large spike-like CBO is inevitable.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据