4.7 Review

Evolution of white organic light-emitting devices: from academic research to lighting and display applications

期刊

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY FRONTIERS
卷 3, 期 6, 页码 970-1031

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9qm00042a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Shenzhen Peacock Plan [KQTD2014062714543296]
  2. Shenzhen Engineering Laboratory (Shenzhen development and reform commission) [[2018] 1410]
  3. Shenzhen Science and Technology research grant [JCYJ20170818085627903, JCYJ20160510144254604, JCYJ20170818090312652, JCYJ20170818085627721]
  4. China (Shenzhen)-Canada Technology Collaboration Project [GJHZ20180420180725249]
  5. Shenzhen Hong Kong Innovation Circle Joint R and D project [SGLH20161212101631809]
  6. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61475060, 61774074, 61474054]
  7. Science and Technology Development Planning of Jilin Province [20190101024JH]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, Apple Inc. launched the highly anticipated cellphone, the iPhone X, which adopts an activematrix organic light-emitting display (AMOLED) for the first time. Since then, AMOLEDs have been in the focus of the display industry and a lot of new production lines have been set up. Apart from smart phone displays, AMOLED TVs are also extremely popular in the consumer market. LG's next-generation OLED TVs have been ranked as the Best of CES for many years, which are based on white organic lightemitting device (WOLED) technology. Nevertheless, it took almost 30 years of tremendous research efforts to develop this technology from a simple experimental sample to such excellent products. In this article, a detailed discussion is presented on the evolution of WOLEDs from academic research to industrial applications. More specifically, parameters to evaluate the device performance and approaches to enhance the device efficiency as well as different device architectures adopted in WOLEDs are reviewed. Lastly, special focus is laid on the applications of WOLEDs in lighting and displays.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据